Before using this in research
The goal is not to adopt another tool. The goal is to reduce verified research time without weakening the evidence trail.
Best for
Review teams that need transparent screening, conflict resolution, deduplication, extraction, and audit trails.
First step
Define inclusion and exclusion criteria before importing references into any screening platform.
A safer workflow
- 1Export search results from each database with source labels and dates.
- 2Deduplicate records while preserving enough metadata for audit.
- 3Pilot screening criteria on a small batch and resolve disagreements.
- 4Track decisions, conflicts, excluded reasons, and final counts for PRISMA reporting.
Watch-outs
- AI-assisted screening should support reviewer decisions, not replace them.
- A weak protocol will produce messy results no matter which tool is used.
- Export options and audit trails matter more than interface polish.
Evidence checks
- Can decisions be exported with reviewer and timestamp information?
- Can the review team reproduce the PRISMA flow numbers?
- Does the workflow separate automatic ranking from final inclusion decisions?
Need the complete current version?
Open the full detail page
This English version is a curated decision page. The full current detail page remains available while the English library is being expanded.
Open current full topic